Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Supreme court

  • As the U.S. Supreme Court wrapped up over six hours of arguments on the Obama health law on Wednesday afternoon, all sides left the courtroom without a clear idea of how the Justices might rule.
  • (Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog))
  • WASHINGTON - Concluding three days of fervent, public disagreement, a Supreme Court seemingly split over ideology will now wrestle in private about whether to strike down key parts or even all of President Barack Obamas historic health care law.
  • (Minneapolis Star Tribune)
  • CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- West Virginia Supreme Court candidate Letitia Tish Chafin proposed Wednesday that the court strengthen its rules that require justices to step aside from cases in which they have conflicts of interest.
  • (Charleston Gazette)
  • Ready to go!" Health care had been an important issue in his campaign, but hardly the central thrust. If the Supreme Court strikes down the health care law, Republicans hope to make it a prominent element of their effort to deny him a second term.
  • (New York Times)
  • FROM CNNs Jack Cafferty: If the Supreme Court rules the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional this summer, it would be a huge embarrassment for President Barack Obama. Health care reform has been the presidents signature issue.
  • (CNN)

No comments:

Post a Comment